An article based on a survey of farmers examines the factors that can be used to identify landowners who are more willing to cooperate in coordinated flood protection.

Abstract: Flooding poses a significant and recurring threat in numerous regions. The adverse impacts of flooding can be mitigated through risk sharing, such as insurance or risk reduction. However, insurance might not be accessible in underdeveloped markets or in instances where floods are too frequent. Similarly, the necessary funding or land for structural measures might not be available. Alternatively, measures could be implemented on private land, either through individual initiatives or as part of a coordinated effort. This approach was explored in the flood-prone regions of Albania and North Macedonia. A survey conducted among 124 farmers revealed that 73% of them are willing to allocate land for flood mitigation, provided they receive adequate compensation. Furthermore, certain factors increase farmers’ willingness to cooperate. A logit model indicated a positive correlation between expectations of future floods (increased severity and frequency), receipt of ex-ante financial support, positive perception of the effectiveness of agricultural flood mitigation measures, and age. Those who view flood protection as personal responsibility and those more inclined to pay for flood insurance are less likely to cooperate. The findings could be utilized to identify farmers who are likely to contribute to establishing a coordinated effort on a stable basis.

Citation: Brabec, J., Macháč, J., Kis, A., Ungvári, G. (2024). Factors influencing farmers’ willingness to provide private land for a coordinated flood mitigation scheme in the Drin basin. Journal of Flood Risk Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13027

Download: ↓ Factors influencing farmers’ willingness to provide private land for a coordinated flood mitigation scheme in the Drin basin

This article explores how children from Generation Z perceive the attractiveness of nature-based solutions and which ecosystem services they value most.

Abstract: Current studies on nature-based solutions (NBS) in urban areas often overlook young people, who are essential users of urban spaces. Our study from the Czech Republic fills this gap by investigating how children (Generation Z, 11–15 years) perceive 12 NBS and 3 grey infrastructure measures and their ecosystem services (ES). Results from an image-based questionnaire survey indicate that water features, trees and flower beds are the most attractive for spending leisure time, while most other features were perceived as relatively unattractive by the children surveyed. In addition, the results highlight oxygen production as the most valued service by children, followed by biodiversity support and aesthetic function. This study emphasises the need for inclusive management of NBS and recognises the role of multiple stakeholders, including children, in creating attractive urban spaces.

Citation: Hekrle, M., Drdla, J. (2024). Talking to the young generation: perception of nature-based solutions’ attractiveness by children from Generation Z. Local Environment, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2407608

Download: ↓ Talking to the young generation: perception of nature-based solutions’ attractiveness by children from Generation Z

This article compares different cost–benefit analysis (CBA) approaches to assess the economic value of real green roof projects.

Download: ↓ Evaluating Importance of Community Gardens in Times of Calm and Crisis: From Relaxation to Food Self-Provisioning